The Helen de
Leeuw legacy: redesigning South Africa.
Curated by Juliette Leeb-du Toit (VIAD
Research Associate)
In the proposed
Helen de Leeuw legacy exhibition, tribute is being paid to a phenomenal woman
entrepreneur, ceramicist and writer, Helen de Leeuw, who in the 1950s began a
lifelong challenge to the South African market to rid itself of erstwhile
preferences (both anglophile and American) for mass-produced, inferior products
that had begun to overwhelm commercial production and suppress emergent and indigenous
craft traditions.
Few urban South
Africans who lived through the period 1953 to c1988 will fail to recall the
impact of the Helen de Leeuw phenomenon. Writing in 1965, Isobelle du
Toit noted that Helen de Leeuw’s name was synonymous with ‘good,
modern and imaginative taste’ and design in all its aspects in textiles,
craftwork, architecture, furniture, interior design, jewellery and ceramics. De
Leeuw’s stores in effect functioned as galleries of contemporary international
and national design.
Reflecting her vast
and accruing knowledge of avant-garde post-war design from Europe, especially Finland,
de Leeuw‘s galleries were in many ways an extension of herself, her taste and
preferences. To her design was no longer to be dictated from above, but was
ideally eclectic, idiosyncratic and flexible. Her stores were
typified by an uncanny aura of the authenticity that she craved – they
contained articles of natural materials that were well designed and unusual.
Articles were selected because they
were handmade, reflected care and craftsmanship, and had ‘an honesty’ that she appreciated.
She embraced locally produced items that reflected this as well as imports,
drawn to countries that have a ‘craftsman approach’ and was among the first to
include indigenous ceramics and beadwork in her galleries.
She was the first to
exhibit local pottery such as the work of Esias Bosch, Andrew Walford and
Liebermann ceramics, exhibiting their work alongside that of Arabia,
Arzberg and local Zulu and Venda wares
in an eclectic mix that came to mark shifting, culturally inclusive post-war
South African preferences.
As the doyenne
of what was described as ‘modernist design’ in all its aspects, Esme Berman noted: ‘Helen de Leeuw has been
responsible more than any other single person in South Africa for developing in
the public a sound taste and a feeling for good design and craftsmanship’. (The
Star, 4 Aug 1980).
In this
exhibition the gallery will partly replicate aspects of her Craftsman’s Market
interiors to reflect the diversity of her design preferences in photographs as
well as a collection of items sourced originally in her commercial outlets. We
would like to encourage those who have items acquired from De Leeuw to consider lending these for inclusion in
the exhibition. If you have any
particular information regarding De Leeuw that you would care to share with the
curatorial team we would be pleased to have you contact us at leebdutoitj@gmail.com
Curated by Marlize Groenewald.
Ernst de Jong
was born in 1934, in Pretoria, South Africa. In 1951, he was awarded an
athletic scholarship to the University of Oklahoma (OU), in the USA. Here he pursued a degree in Fine Arts
(majoring in Information Design) and was taught by, amongst others, John
O’Neill — known for his abstract imagery and early modern style — and Emilio
Amero, a leading figure of the Mexican modern art movement. Beyond the
classroom, de Jong encountered the work of creative practitioners such as Ben
Shahn and Saul Steinberg, who merged commercial illustration with fine art
practice. He was introduced to the workings of the local petroleum industry, an
eclectic mix of cowboy and American Indian culture, as well as the
transformative project, spearheaded by Governor Raymond Gary, of Oklahoma from
a bucolic backwater to an industrialised, ‘modern’ state.
In 1955, de
Jong married Gwendolyn Drennan, a fellow student at OU, and in 1957 the couple
returned to South Africa. In 1958, both de Jongs secured lecturing positions at
the Art School of the Pretoria College for Advanced Technical Education. The school, under the directorship of Albert
Werth, was, in Gwen de Jong’s words, staffed by ‘quite an extraordinary bunch
of people’ who sought to engage with the domestication of modernism in a
peripheral, African community. The emphasis was on craft. Colleagues included
Peter Eliastam, who along with the de Jongs taught applied design; Zakkie Eloff
who taught portraiture; Robert Hodgins, painting, life drawing and basic
design; Leo Theron, mosaic; Maxie Steytler, fabric painting and design; Carol
Hamilton, history of art and architecture; and Dulcie Campbell, ceramics.
Although de
Jong’s primary aim was to construct a reputation for himself as a painter, his
contribution to the field of design is, arguably, his greater legacy. In the
opinion of former students, he pioneered the idea of graphic design as a
profession in Southern Africa. He would also be instrumental in the
implementation of the first university degree in Southern Africa that
acknowledged the discipline of information design. Realising that there was a
shortage of design skills in the then Transvaal, he opened his own design
consultancy, Ernst de Jong Studios (EDJS), in 1958.
The studio, situated across the road from the Pretoria College, recruited top graduates and executed commissions that, in their number, variety and reference to American modernism, set the de Jongs apart as exciting ‘new stars’. The studio acquired legendary status, not least because its director was held in awe as the local ‘Afrikaans’ boy who helped steer South Africa into the rarefied world of international design trends.
In 1987 de Jong received the once-off Dashing Society of Designers of South Africa Crystal Award for Outstanding Design Achievement. Finally, in 1994, after directing the collaborative project of designing South Africa’s iconic ‘Big Five’ bank note series, de Jong closed EDJS in order to travel, teach and paint.
The studio, situated across the road from the Pretoria College, recruited top graduates and executed commissions that, in their number, variety and reference to American modernism, set the de Jongs apart as exciting ‘new stars’. The studio acquired legendary status, not least because its director was held in awe as the local ‘Afrikaans’ boy who helped steer South Africa into the rarefied world of international design trends.
In 1987 de Jong received the once-off Dashing Society of Designers of South Africa Crystal Award for Outstanding Design Achievement. Finally, in 1994, after directing the collaborative project of designing South Africa’s iconic ‘Big Five’ bank note series, de Jong closed EDJS in order to travel, teach and paint.
Within the
context of its thirty-six year existence, it is impossible to convey in any
detail the breadth and relevance of the output of EDJS. In this sampling of the
studio’s work and the style that de Jong favoured in his project of
‘modernising’ the nation (and perhaps, most particularly, white, middle-class
Pretoria), the emphasis is on de Jong’s environmental graphics. Although
additional material provides a context for the display, the exhibition lifts
out de Jong’s earliest commissions, such as the design and construction of show
stands for exhibitors at industrial expositions in Pretoria and Johannesburg.
This selection provides a link to the spatial nature of the accompanying exhibition of Helen de Leeuw’s modernising rhetoric that evinces interesting parallels of circumstance and purpose with that of de Jong. Both individuals could be said, as Chris Barron claims for de Leeuw, to have ‘created an alternative way of living for … South Africans suffocating in a stuffy aesthetic inherited from the British colonial past’.
This selection provides a link to the spatial nature of the accompanying exhibition of Helen de Leeuw’s modernising rhetoric that evinces interesting parallels of circumstance and purpose with that of de Jong. Both individuals could be said, as Chris Barron claims for de Leeuw, to have ‘created an alternative way of living for … South Africans suffocating in a stuffy aesthetic inherited from the British colonial past’.